Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 21, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

Petitioner appeals from dismissal of his petition for writ of mandamus (ORS 34.110, 34.120) seeking to require the Superintendent of Oregon State Penitentiary to discontinue “present censorship practices which are in violation of the rights of the 1st and 4th Amendment of the U. S. Constitution,” alleging in particular:

“1. The defendant does not allow correspondance [sic] without first acquiring written permission from petitioner to censor all incoming and outgoing mail of petitioner.
“2. The defendant further violates the petitioners rights by taking outgoing mad and having copies made of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palmigiano v. TravisonoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1970
  2. Newton v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  3. State v. BrothertonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McCoyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. State v. MuhammadCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API