Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re Adoption No. 10087

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 30, 1991No. 92, September Term, 1990Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEldridge, Judge

I concur with the majority’s decision reversing the judgments of the Court of Special Appeals and the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. I also agree with the majority that on remand the circuit court’s “foremost consideration ... should be a determination of whether adoption at this time would be in the best interests of this child.” I disagree, however, with the other “directives]” issued to the circuit court. Compliance with such directives might result in a decision which is inconsistent with the best interests of the child.

Furthermore, I see no need for much of the majority’s…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. Multistate Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Bridges v. NicelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Spencer v. FranksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  4. Carroll County Department of Social Services v. EdelmannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Walker v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API