Legal Opinion

Rampello v. Ferguson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that Anthony J. Rampello (plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury in the motor vehicle accident on March 8, 1995 (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). Defendant failed to make “a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by coming forward with competent proof refuting the allegations of the complaint as amplified by the bill of particulars” (Balnys v Town of New Baltimore, 160 AD2d 1136; see, Owens v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Balnys v. Town of New BaltimoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Owens v. NolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wiegand v. SchunckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Bagshaw v. Network Service Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Aleksiejuk v. PellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API