Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Oppenheimer Management Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 31, 1989No. 82 Civ. 2120 (RWS)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Richard Meyer as custodian for Pamela Meyer (“Meyer”) has moved under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) to disqualify me from determining the final issue presented by Meyer’s complaint against Oppenheimer Management Corp., Oppenheimer Asset Management Corp., Oppenheimer & Co., Oppenheimer Holdings, Inc. (collectively “Oppenheimer”), A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. (“Edwards”), Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc. (“Thomson McKinnon”), J.C. Bradford & Co. (“Bradford”), Bateman Eichler, Hill & Richards, Inc. (“Hill Richards”), Centennial Capital Corp. (“Centennial”), and Daily…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. In Re International Business MacHines Corporation, United States of America v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Louis Charles King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API