Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
Francis, • J. C. C.
(temporarily assigned). The proofs in affidavit form tend to show that the distributorship contract between Thor Corporation and Teldisco, Inc., was substantially complete when the plaintiff instituted its suit and obtained the restraint against Thor. The terms of the contract had been agreed upon orally. Thor had reduced the terms to a written instrument, and submitted it to Teldisco which signed it. The final signature by Thor was prevented by the restraint.
As a further indication of the fact that the parties regarded their contractual relationship as established, there…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Di Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Leslie Blau Co. v. AlfieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- McCue v. DeppertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Grillo v. Bd. of Realtors of Plainfield AreaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.