Legal Opinion

State v. Gurske

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 2005No. 75156-1PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

fl Madsen, J.

Petitioner Samuel William Gurske contends that his deadly weapon sentence enhancement is invalid because the pistol found in a backpack in his truck was not readily available, and therefore he was not armed at the time of the commission of the crime of possession of a controlled substance. We agree and reverse the Court of Appeals.

*136Facts

¶2 The parties stipulated to the facts. On August 2, 2001, a Pullman, Washington, police officer stopped Gurske for making an illegal left turn. The officer asked Gurske for his driver’s license, vehicle registration, and insurance information. Mr.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ValdobinosWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. SchelinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. SchelinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. WillisWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. WillisWashington Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2007

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API