Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Carney Hospital Corp.
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided June 10, 1998No. 942583PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
INTRODUCTION
The defendants, Carney Hospital Corporation (Carney or the Hospital), Dennis Gada, Sister Kathleen Natwin, Thomas Walsh, and Mark Duro (the defendants) have moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial or remittitur pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 50 and 59. Under Mass.R.Civ.P. 50(a), the Court took this motion with leave reserved. The defendants claim that 1) the jury’s verdict is not supported by the evidence at trial; 2) the verdict should be reversed because of the prejudicial effect of, and “constitutional problems associated with” the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Patricia Babrocky v. Jewel Food Company and Retail Meatcutters Union, Local 320, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Witlow v. Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2004