State v. Bonner
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
PONDER, Justice.
While this appeal was not consolidated with the defendant’s application for the writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and review, 193 La. 387, 190 So. 621, yet, both counsel for the defendant and counsel for the. State in their arguments and in their briefs treated them as though they were consolidated. The only question that can be considered on the appeal is the question of constitutionality or legality of the parochial ordinance, No. 188, which the defendant was convicted of violating. With regard to an appeal on the question of constitutionality of a state statute,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Downs v. DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Town of Ruston v. FountainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- State v. ZurichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- City of Shreveport v. GregorySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Baton Rouge v. RossSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- State v. BroussardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Liquefied Petroleum Gas Commission v. E. R. Kiper Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- City of Minden v. HarrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.