Legal Opinion
Maheu v. Long Island Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Geoffrey J. O’Connell, J.
The parties to this action have agreed to a bench trial of this third-party action on a submitted stipulation of facts. The third-party plaintiff DeSanto Construction Corp. seeks to recover from third-party defendant Fish-Miller Associates, Inc., sums expended in the defense of the main action and to satisfy the judgment.
Stipulated Facts
Robert Maheu, an employee of DeSanto Construction Corp., made a claim for personal injuries sustained while working at a Long Island Railroad (Railroad or LIRR) station project.
DeSanto Construction had been hired to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. KuhnNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Pennsylvania General Insurance v. Austin Powder Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- North Star Reinsurance Corp. v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Home Insurance Company v. Pinski Brothers, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1972
- Soho Generation of New York, Inc. v. Tri-City Insurance Brokers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Hamilton Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018