Legal Opinion

People v. Qoshja

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2011No. 194PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the matter remitted to that court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.

The Appellate Division’s summary decision and order leaves it unclear whether the panel reached the merits of defendant Ermal Qoshja’s claim or predicated its affirmance on the waiver of appeal. We remit to the Appellate Division to clarify this question and, if appropriate, to consider the merits. We repeat what we said in People v Callahan (80 NY2d 273, 285 [1992]):

“[I]n cases where there has been a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BaqueNew York Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. People v. GilliamNew York Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API