Legal Opinion

Johnson v. . Whilden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 1916Published

Petition- to rehear cause decided by this Court at Spring Term, 1914, and reported in 166 N. 0., 104. Petition having been allowed, the cause was again duly considered and the former judgment affirmed.

1Opinion

On the hearing of the defendant's appeal in this cause, 166 N.C. 104, an examination of the record disclosed that two (157) issues were determined by the jury, one as to plaintiff's ownership of the land and the second as to whether the defendant had any interest therein.

To the first of these the jury answered "Yes," and to the second, "No, except as to the interest of the Tuckaseigee Mining Company, under the decree aforesaid."

There was judgment on the verdict merely that plaintiff was the owner of the land under the deed of trust and that he recover costs. This Court, observing that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stevens v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Clark v. Carolina Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Downing v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Johnson v. . WhildenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Board of Commissioners v. ScalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API