People v. Soto

*532Defendant did not preserve his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. We further find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The evidence, especially when viewed in light of the presumption contained in Penal Law § 265.15 (3), warrants the conclusion that defendant possessed a revolver found behind the front passenger seat of a car. Defendant had been observed…