Commonwealth v. Tiffany
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtEndicott, J.
This is a complaint under the St. of 1869, c. 384, § 19, and it contains the charge that the defendant “ in that portion of a certain pond, commonly known as Pratt’s Pond, in which fishes are lawfully artificially cultivated and maintained, did unlawfully fish, without the permission of Daniel W. Batchelor, the proprietor of said pond.” The defendant moved before the magistrate and in the Superior Court before the jury were empanelled, to quash the complaint, because it did not allege that Batchelor was the proprietor of the pond, or that the pond had been leased to any person by*the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VincentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Commonwealth v. BarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Coolidge v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- Commonwealth v. WeatherheadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
3Cited by7 opinions
- Watuppa Reservoir Co. v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Concord Manufacturing Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
- Barrows v. McDermottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1882
- State v. FrickerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
- Sprague v. MinonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.