Legal Opinion

Vitale v. Hagan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1988PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*957OPINION OF THE COURT

Order modified, with costs to defendant City of New York against plaintiff, by dismissing the cause of action for malicious prosecution only as against defendant city for the reasons stated in so much of the dissenting memorandum of Presiding Justice Francis T. Murphy, Jr., at the Appellate Division (132 AD2d 468, 470-472) as relates to the untimely and thus invalid notice of claim and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against defendant Hagan.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bender v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Ismail v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Ismail v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. Bender v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. Yang Feng Zhao v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API