Legal Opinion
Colicci v. Ruhm
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oneida County (Frank S. Cook, J.), entered March 12, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, granted that part of the petition seeking to suspend petitioner’s child support obligation.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by suspending child support payments effective March 12, 2004, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Family Court properly granted that part of the petition seeking to suspend…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baraby v. BarabyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Weinreich v. WeinreichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Smith v. BombardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Kershaw v. KershawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People ex rel. Breitstein v. AaronsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stauffer v. StubbsNew York City Family Court · 2006
- Matter of Stauffer v. StubbsNew York Family Court, Monroe County · 2006
- Matter of Zwiefach v. HeitzmannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025