Bush v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of gaming; from city court of Miller county — Judge Bush.
1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.
Before the arraignment of the plaintiff in error he filed a plea in abatement, which the court struck, and this ruling is the ground of exception presented by the writ of error. The plea in abatement conforms to the requirements laid down in McRae v. State, 71 Ga. 99, Mize v. State, 135 Ga. 295 (69 S. E. 173), Folds v. State, 123 Ga. 167 (51 S. E. 305), and Wall v. State, 126 Ga. 549 (55 S. E. 484), in that it was filed at the proper time; for, this being an accusation, of course there had been no opportunity for the defendant sooner to object. However, in our opinion the court properly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mize v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Wall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Folds v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Channell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Whitehurst v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sorrells v. SorrellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Young v. Town of MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Webb v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Haggard v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.