BNSF Railway Co. v. Feit
Montana Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Morris
¶17 The United States District Court has asked us, in effect, to define “physical or mental impairment” as used in the MHRA. I agree with the Court that we must turn to federal law to guide us. Opinion, ¶ 8. Luck would have it that the EEOC-the federal commission responsible for enforcing the ADA-has created a regulatory definition that defines “physical or mental impairment.” 29 C.F.R. 1630.2(h)(1). This definition provides, in pertinent part, that “physical or mental impairment” includes “any physiological disorder, or condition” that affects a major system of the human body. 29 C.F.R.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cook v. Rhode Island, Department of Mental Health, Retardation, & HospitalsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- John A. Francis v. City of MeridenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Torcasio v. MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Sports Shooting Ass'n v. State, Mt. Dept. of FwpMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Andrews v. OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.