Legal Opinion

Knowles Loom Works v. Ryle

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 1899Published

Motion by Defendant for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict.

1Opinion of the Court

MePHERSON, District Judge.

Two questions are raised by this motion:

1. Is the defendant a bona fide purchaser for value of the silk company’s bonds, so that he is at liberty to question the legal validity of the so-called “lease” made by the plaintiff to the silk company? There is no dispute upon this point. The question must be answered in the affirmative.

2. Was the contract between the plaintiff and the silk company a bailment or a conditional sale? To this question I think the answer must be that the contract was a conditional sale; the consequence being that it cannot be enforced against…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ryle v. Knowles Loom WorksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API