Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Barbara F. Adamo

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 2, 2003No. 02-15448PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Barry S. Slakman, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Barbara F. Adamo, Sherwin Glass, and Continental Casualty Co. in Continental’s interpleader action. The district court found that Slak-man was prohibited from recovering life insurance benefits under section 33-25-13 of the Code of Georgia, because he was convicted of murdering his wife, the insured. Slakman, however, asserts that section 33-25-13 does not prohibit recovery until his conviction becomes “final” under state law. As this case turns on an important question of state law for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John E. Washburn, Director of Insurance for the State of Illinois v. Gene Rabun, D/B/A Rabun's Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Esther Latorre v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. James A. Keener v. Convergys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deramus v. DONOVAN, LEISURE, NEWTONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. WoodallDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2003
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Barbara F. AdamoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API