Legal Opinion

Jennison Bros. v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1916No. Nos. 19,658—(67)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Waseca county against the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company and R. M. Dixon to recover $292.65. The facts are stated in the opinion. The ease was tried before Childress, J., who made findings and dismissed the action as to defendant Dixon. From an order denying its motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This is in substance an action against defendant Dixon for money had and received. The controlling facts are undisputed. Defendant Dixon, who will be referred to hereafter as defendant, is a merchant at St. Charles, Minnesota, and plaintiff operates a flour and feed mill at Janesville, Minnesota. At various times between September, 1907, and June, *2691913, defendant bought flour and feed from plaintiff in carload lots to be delivered by plaintiff at St. Charles for an agreed price per barrel for flour and per ton for feed. As each lot was ordered, plaintiff shipped it to St.'…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  2. Vetter v. SandboSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. McGrew Coal Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  3. Houck v. Hubbard Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. Cobbs v. Joyce-Watkins Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API