Legal Opinion

People v. Ruberto

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1962PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The witness Guglielmiui implicated the defendant in the commission of the crime of which he stands convicted and, even if he were deemed an accomplice, defendant’s false stories, evincing as they do a consciousness of guilt on his part, constituted—in the light of the entire record before us — the essential corroborative evidence for accomplice testimony. (See People v. Leyra, 1 N Y 2d 199, 208; People v. Deitsch, 237 N. Y. 300, 303.) We would merely add that, in reaching our decision to affirm, we considered the defendant’s contention that the prosecutor acted improperly in making certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. . DeitschNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. People v. LevineNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. People v. . PindarNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. SimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. People v. PotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Glucksman v. BirnsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  5. People v. PotenzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API