Legal Opinion

Weikamp v. Jungers

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 17, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Sioux District Court. — Hon. John F. Oliver, Judge. Action to establish boundary line resulted in decree as prayed, and the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

A highway extends along the section line between sections eleven and fourteen. The plaintiff owns the S. y% S. E. % and N. W. % S. E. % of section eleven, and defendant Moes the S. W. % of that section. The defendant Neuter' owns the N. E. % of section fourteen, and the defendant Jungers the N. W. y. thereof. The petition alleges that the quarter corner has been lost and that the entire section line is in dispute and prays that said line be established, 'all of which is denied in the answer and acquiescence for more than ten years alleged. Commissioners were appointed with authority to take…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Quinn v. BaageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Yocum v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  3. Doolittle v. BaileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  4. Mitchell v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  5. Vittoe v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of ShenandoahSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. McGovern v. HeerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Schultz v. StringerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Lannigan v. AndreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. Iowa Loan & Trust Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API