Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Greer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 29, 1950Published

1Opinion of the Court

Frankenthaler, S.

Petitioner alleges that he has a claim for an administration expense and he seeks to compel the executor to pay it out of the estate assets. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 217.) His claim is based upon services alleged to have been rendered to the estate fiduciary (at that time, the temporary administrator) in making investigations and collecting evidence to identify the statutory distributee of the testatrix. Petitioner alleges that the services were rendered pursuant to an express retainer by the attorneys for the estate. He has failed to establish by a fair preponderance of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ZieglerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  2. In re the Estate of ChavesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. In re the Estate of GellerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. In re the Estate of SielckenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  5. In re the Estate of KaufmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API