Legal Opinion

Hompes v. B. F. Goodrich Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1939No. 30533PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiff, Henry Hompes, against the B. F. Goodrich Company and others under the Junkin Act (Comp. St. 1929, secs. 59-801 to 59-822) for damages alleged to have resulted from a conspiracy of the defendants, in restraint of trade, to exclude the plaintiff from dealing in Goodrich products and to monopolize a part of the trade and commerce of the state. From a verdict and judgment for $25,000, the defendants appeal.

The record shows that since 1925, under the trade-name of Hompes Tire Company, plaintiff has been conducting a business in the city of Lincoln of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James Poultry Co. v. City of Nebraska CityNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State ex rel. Spillman v. Interstate Power Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Marsh-Burke Co. v. YostNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Crancer v. ReichenbachNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of America v. Farmers Educational & Cooperative State UnionNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nelsen v. TilleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Diesel Service, Inc. v. Accessory Sales, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Barish v. Chrysler CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Tobin Quarries, Inc. v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1946
  5. Frentzel v. SiebrandtNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API