Legal Opinion

Hartnett v. City of Sioux City

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 3, 1885Published

Appeal from Woodbury District Coiort. This is an action in equity to restrain defendant and its officers from interfering with plaintiffs in their work of grading and filling certain lots belonging to them. The district court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Reed J.

1. AKPEAI. to supreme evidence: time. The judgment appealed from was entered on the sixteenth of April, 1884. Defendant filed an abstract in which certain evidence introduced on the trial is , set forth, but it is not alleged therein that the abstract contains all the evidence, nor is it shown therein that the evidence was certified by the j udge who tried the case. Plaintiffs filed an amended abstract, in which it is alleged that the district judge certified the evidence on the sixth of February, 1885. The correctness of this abstract is not denied. Plaintiff filed in this court a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mitchell v. LaubSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API