Legal Opinion

Rothschild v. Harris

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Alexander Rothschild and another against Isaac Harris and another. On motion for a new trial by plaintiffs after verdict for defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

The jury found a verdict in favor of defendants. On the rendition thereof the plaintiffs made a motion upon the minutes to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, upon the, exceptions taken at the trial, and because the verdict, was contrary to the evidence and contrary to law) and upon all the grounds specified in section 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The facts are as follows: That in the city of New York, on the 9th and 22d days of December, 1909, the plaintiffs sold and delivered to defendants goods, wares, and merchandise át the agreed value of $2,-816.27. That the defendants paid…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Place v. . MinsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Martin v. . Home BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Butler Bros. v. HirzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Baumann v. TannenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Butler Bros. v. HirzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. French v. State Farmers' Mutual Hail InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API