Legal Opinion

People v. Hutton

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1970No. Docket 5,253PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, P. J.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of breaking and entering in violation of MOLA § 750.110 (Stat Ann 1969 Cum Supp § 28.305). His motion for new trial was denied and he appeals. The principal question presented concerns application of the principles enunciated in the identification trilogy, United States v. Wade (1967), 388 US 218 (87 S Ct 1926, 18 L Ed 2d 1149); Gilbert v. California (1967), 388 US 263 (87 S Ct 1951,18 L Ed 2d 1178), and Stovall v. Denno (1967), 388 US 293 (87 S Ct 1967, 18 L Ed 2d 1199). We have concluded that defendant’s conviction must be reversed for error in the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. People v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. KacharMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. HarperMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. People v. SpauldingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API