Legal Opinion

Beasley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1929No. 12452Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

HAWKINS, Judge

— In sustaining the action of the trial court in denying appellant’s application for continuance we predicated our original opinion on the proposition that, admitting the testimony of the absent witness to be true, it was not in conflict with the state’s testimony which went to establish appellant’s guilt. In his motion for rehearing appellant very frankly admits the proposition stated as being correct and supported by the authorities cited, and that it is applicable to all the witnesses for whom continuance was sought except the witness Jess Sayers, but…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Koller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Asken v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Beard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API