Legal Opinion

Coker v. Jay Hambidge Art Foundation

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 1, 1978No. 54929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Chief Judge.

At issue is the correctness of the grant of summary judgment to defendants on the ground that the present suit for breach of employment contract was barred by reason that it should have been asserted as a compulsory counterclaim in a prior suit between the defendant Art Foundation and the plaintiffs.

The facts are not in dispute. The earlier suit was one for injunctive relief in which defendant Foundation sought a temporary and permanent injunction against the plaintiffs (defendants there) restraining them from occupying a cottage on the Foundation premises. Immediately after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Myers v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Usher v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Chapman v. Aetna Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Metro Brokers, Inc. v. Sams & Cole, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Ransom v. WaldripCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. John W. Chapman and Hattie Chapman v. Aetna Finance Company, Timothy Burgess v. Mitchell Motors, Inc. And General Motors Acceptance Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API