Legal Opinion
Minnesota Bond Ltd. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 13, 1985No. 31205; CA A27859PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*189ROSSMAN, J.
Insurer appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the insured under a fire insurance contract, claiming that arson and misrepresentation by the insured’s 50 percent shareholder, officer and director bars any recovery for the losses after the fire.1 We disagree and accordingly affirm.
Plaintiff, Minnesota Bond Ltd., is an Oregon corporation and the named insured in a fire insurance policy issued by defendant.2 Before plaintiffs incorporation, Jean Wallace operated All-Ways Hair & Care Port (All-Ways), a beauty salon, and her daughter, Lynda DiGeorge, operated Girl Friday, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gordon Creek Tree Farms, Inc. v. LayneOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Miller & Dobrin, Etc., Co. v. CAMDEN FIRE, ASS'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- D. I. Felsenthal Co. v. Northern Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Giacobetti v. Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Continental Insurance v. Gustav's Stable Club, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- K & T Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Dairy Queen of Blissfield, and Tahani Khoury v. Zurich Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Hoosier Insurance v. North South Trucking Supplies, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Minnesota Bond Ltd. v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- McLeod v. Tecorp International, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Hoosier Insurance v. North South Trucking Supplies, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.