Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Ryan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1968No. 40566PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneideR, J.

Upon the solicitation and advice of defendant Ryan, plaintiff Henderson embarked upon an in*32vestment scheme involving receivables of Goldendale Pine Company (later Interlakes-Gulf Lumber Company, Inc.) of which Ryan was an officer, director and attorney. He also was, and for a number of years had been, attorney for Henderson, his family and his plumbing business.

It appears that over a considerable period of time Henderson purchased, at an uncommonly high discount rate, accounts receivable due Goldendale supported by sales invoices, which in turn were secured by railroad bills of lading. A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Rogers v. City of WhitehallOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. ApanovitchOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Shafer v. Wintrow (In Re Wintrow)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
  5. Schulz v. Allstate Insurance, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API