Legal Opinion
Jakovich v. Romer
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 3, 1925No. Docket No. 5187PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendants to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract. The ease was tried in the trial court without a jury. Judgment was rendered in behalf of the defendants and the plaintiffs have appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.
In their complaint the plaintiffs pleaded the contract. That instrument consisted of two papers as follows:
“Grape Contract.
“This Contract, made between Eobert Eomer & Company of San Francisco, California, Seller, and Jakovich & Dogan, of Chicago, Illinois, Buyer, Witnesseth:
“Said Buyer hereby agrees…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McInerney v. MackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Biescar v. PrattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hanna Nielsen S. S. Co. v. Hammond S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929