Legal Opinion

Jakovich v. Romer

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1925No. Docket No. 5187PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendants to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract. The ease was tried in the trial court without a jury. Judgment was rendered in behalf of the defendants and the plaintiffs have appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

In their complaint the plaintiffs pleaded the contract. That instrument consisted of two papers as follows:

“Grape Contract.
“This Contract, made between Eobert Eomer & Company of San Francisco, California, Seller, and Jakovich & Dogan, of Chicago, Illinois, Buyer, Witnesseth:
“Said Buyer hereby agrees…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McInerney v. MackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Biescar v. PrattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hanna Nielsen S. S. Co. v. Hammond S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API