Legal Opinion

Long v. Ansell

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 5, 1934No. 6008PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

_ _ This ease comes here by special appeal from an order ox the court below denymg defendant’s motion to quash the summons and service issued_ upon a petition filed by respondent, plaintiff below charging the _ defendant with publishing a false and malicious e'. _ The publication, it is alleged, purported to be a report of a speech made by the defendant on the floor of the Senate of the United States. It is alleged that the speech itself contained libelous and defamatory statements; and that the defendant caused copies of the Congressional Record containing the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. StrubeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  3. Rhodes v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. People ex rel. Taranto v. ErlangerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1904
  5. Gentry v. Griffith, Hyatt & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Morton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. William C. Coleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  3. United States v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  4. Maniaci v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  5. United States v. ScottDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API