Howard v. Ramsey
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner
Affirming.
An instrument probated as the will of Henry Howard devised' bis estate equally to his wife and brother, Noah ITowárd. It was contested upon the grounds of forgery and, alternatively, of mental incapacity and undue influence. We reversed a judgment sustaining the will because the court had erroneously required the contestants to elect as between their allegations of forgery and of incapacity and influence. Ramsey v. Howard, 289 Ky. 389, 158 S. W. (2d) 981. On a second trial the jury disagreed. On the third trial the verdict was that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Broaddus's devisees v. Broaddus's heirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
- Hildreth v. HildrethCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Preece v. WoolfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Ramsey v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Cary-Glendon Coal Co. v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
3Cited by2 opinions
- Copley v. CraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
- Howard v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953