Legal Opinion

People v. Reid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 25, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s applications for a competency examination; the court’s observations and the totality of the circumstances supported the conclusion that an examination was not necessary (see, People v Washington, 223 AD2d 478). Contrary to defendant’s contention, defense counsel’s representations alone that defendant could not meaningfully assist in his defense did not mandate examination (see, People v Morgan, 87 NY2d 878). Nor is there merit to defendant’s contention that he was improperly precluded from impeaching a witness whom he…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. EspinalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. FranklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API