People v. Reid
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s applications for a competency examination; the court’s observations and the totality of the circumstances supported the conclusion that an examination was not necessary (see, People v Washington, 223 AD2d 478). Contrary to defendant’s contention, defense counsel’s representations alone that defendant could not meaningfully assist in his defense did not mandate examination (see, People v Morgan, 87 NY2d 878). Nor is there merit to defendant’s contention that he was improperly precluded from impeaching a witness whom he…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. EspinalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. FranklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004