Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Shively v. Murphy Motor Freight

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1994No. 93-1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Loss of dependency dictates redistribution of the former dependents’ death benefits among the remaining dependents. See State ex rel. Columbus & S. Ohio Elec. v. Indus. Comm. (1979), 65 Ohio App.2d 83, 14 O.O.3d 85, 416 N.E.2d 629. No statutory formula directs how these funds are to be reapportioned. Instead:

“ * * * The commission has final discretion to award death benefits solely to those who are wholly dependent or to apportion such benefits among wholly dependent persons and other dependent persons as the commission deems equitable in the circumstances of each particular case.” (Emphasis…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. CommOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Measles v. Indus. Comm. of OhioOhio Court of Claims · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API