Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Bolton

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1990No. 11194Published

1Concurrence

MINZNER, Judge,

specially concurring.

I concur in the result reached by the majority and in the discussion contained in Sections 1, 2(A), 2(B), and 2(D) of the court’s opinion. I agree with the discussion in 2(C) of the period of time during which the vehicle was detained after Border Patrol Agent Burton’s conversation with Officer Newman. I write separately as to the discussion in 2(C) of the period of time during which the vehicle was detained before Burton informed Newman of his observations. I write separately because I view defendants’ first two appellate arguments as closely related and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Ingersoll v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. United States v. Charles Thomas WalravenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. City of Las Cruces v. BetancourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. State v. CohenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API