Legal Opinion

Waddle v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 3, 1997No. CR 97-71Published

1Per curiam

The appellants, Timothy L. Waddle and Irene L. Waddle, have filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Their attorney, C. Richard Lippard, admits that the notice of appeal was untimely filed due to a mistake on his part.

We treat appellants’ request for rule on the clerk as a motion for a belated appeal. See, e.g., Hicks v. State, 325 Ark. 192, 923 S.W.2d 872 (1996). We find that the error of failing to timely file a notice of appeal, admittedly made by counsel for criminal defendants, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

W…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API