Legal Opinion

Hulaniski v. Ogden City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Second District Court, Weber County, Hon. H. H. Rolapp, Judge. Action by plaintiff to recover a certain sum which he claims to be due as a part of his salary as city justice of the peace of Ogden City. From a judgment for defendant plaintiff appeals. Chapter LXIX, page 261, laws of 1897. Section 2481, R. S. 1898. Revised statutes, section 205, relating to ordinances.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Second District Court, Weber County, Hon. H. H. Rolapp, Judge. Action by plaintiff to recover a certain sum which he claims to be due as a part of his salary as city justice of the peace of Ogden City. From a judgment for defendant plaintiff appeals. Chapter LXIX, page 261, laws of 1897. Section 2481, R. S. 1898. Revised statutes, section 205, relating to ordinances. Section 225 provides that the compensation of the officers of the city shall not be increased or diminished to take effect during the term for which any such officer'was elected or appointed. A city charter…

1Opinion of the CourtBaskin, J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover $48.50 which he claims in the second count of his complaint is due to him from the defendant, as part of his salary, as city justice of the peace.of Ogden City, for the months of March, April and May, 1898. The following facts were found by the trial court, and are not disputed by either of the parties to the action, to-wit:

“ That the plaintiff was, on the 2d day of November, 1897, duly elected to the office of city justice of the peace *237in and for Ogden City, a city of the second class in Weber County, Utah, for the term beginning on the first…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meissner v. BoyleUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Boyle v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API