Legal Opinion · Dissent

First State Bank of DeQueen v. Gamble

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 20, 1985No. CA 83-452Published

1DissentMelvin Mayfield, Judge

I do not agree with the decision in this case and I believe it has a procedural significance that requires a full understanding of the issue involved.

On December 26, 1980, the appellee and her husband executed and delivered a promissory note to the appellant bank. The note was due on or before June 26, 1981, and it was secured by a mortgage on real property belonging to the appellee. Sometime before due date, the appellee offered to pay the amount due on the note but only if the bank would release the mortgage on her real estate. The bank refused to do this, and the appellee did not pay the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Renegotiation Board v. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation v. The Renegotiation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. Odaware v. Robertson Aerial-AG, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Massengale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API