Wallace v. DeYoung
Illinois Supreme Court
Writ oe Error to the Appellate Court for the First District ;—heard in that court on error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas A. Moran, Judge, presiding. This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Benjamin E. DeYoung against Frank E. Wallace and Albert Paul Smith, administrators of the estate of John S. Wallace, deceased.
Read the full summary
Writ oe Error to the Appellate Court for the First District ;—heard in that court on error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas A. Moran, Judge, presiding. This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Benjamin E. DeYoung against Frank E. Wallace and Albert Paul Smith, administrators of the estate of John S. Wallace, deceased. On the trial the court, among others, gave the following instruction for the plaintiff, numbered 1: “The court instructs the jury, that if, from the evidence in this case, the jury believe that DeYoung, plaintiff, did render services for J. Seeley Wallace,…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker
This was an action of assumpsit, brought by defendant in error against J. Seeley Wallace, in his lifetime, and revived against the administrators of his estate. The declaration contained the common counts, and the claim of plaintiff in the circuit court was for services rendered for deceased in his lifetime in preparing papers, figuring accounts, and in attending to and looking after his business. A trial was had in the circuit court, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff for $1600. The record was removed to the Appellate Court on error, and on a trial in that court the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- American Stay Co. v. DelaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Fisher v. JansenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
- McCaull v. BrahamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883
- Polk County v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Shults v. ShultsIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.