Knoulton v. Redenbaugh
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from, Harrison District Court. ActioN of replevin. Plaintiff alleges that he is the absolute owner of a certain John.II. Manny reaper and mower, of the value of one hundred dollars. That on the 8th day of July, 1871, he bargained the same to one J. IT.
Read the full summary
Appeal from, Harrison District Court. ActioN of replevin. Plaintiff alleges that he is the absolute owner of a certain John.II. Manny reaper and mower, of the value of one hundred dollars. That on the 8th day of July, 1871, he bargained the same to one J. IT. A. Cart, by a certain contract executed and signed by the said Cart, wherein he agreed to pay therefor on or before the 1st day of January, 1874, the sum of ninety-five. dollars, and that the title and ownership should not pass from plaintiff nntil -the' note is fully paid, and that if plaintiff should at any time deem himself insecure…
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
Prom the petition it' appears that the bargain of sale was made July 8th, 1871. The petition does not show 1 s\u5ofper-tv^wiieifoon-.ciitionai. whefithe debt to Redenbaugh, on account of which the attachment was levied upon the property in controversy, was contracted; but the argument .seems to concede that it was contracted subsequently to the act of the 14th General Assembly, Code of 1873; Section 1922. -This Section is as follows: “No sale, contract, or lease, wherein *116the transfer of title or ownership of personal property is made to depend upon any condition, shall be valid against any…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bartruff v. RemeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
3Cited by5 opinions
- Young v. O'KEEFESupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Azeltine v. LuttermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Russell & Co. v. HarknessUtah Supreme Court · 1885
- Moseley & Bro. v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Thomas v. DisbrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929