Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 28, 2005No. C.A. C-04-319PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE BYSTANDER CLAIMS

HEAD, Chief Judge.

Pending before this Court is Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Bystander Claims (D.E.50).

The Hernandez family members (aside from Irma) are seeking recovery solely as bystanders. Plaintiffs Jose, Ana, Anibel, and Anna Hernandez all personally witnessed the tragic occurrence and the serious, life threatening injuries suffered by Irma Hernandez. To recover as a bystander under Texas law, a plaintiff is required to establish that:(1) The plaintiff was located near the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Riddell Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. KeithTexas Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James v. Antarctic Mechanical Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API