Legal Opinion

State v. Bonifas

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1993No. 12-93-5PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas F. Bryant, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment entered by the Putnam County County Court convicting appellant Susan E. Bonifas of violating R.C. 2917.21(B), telephone harassment.

The assignment of error is:

“The trial court committed an error of law by overruling defendant-appellant’s motion for acquittal pursuant tó Crim.R. 29 where the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt each material element of the offense of telephone harassment.”

In State v. Bridgeman (1978), 55 Ohio St.2d 261, 9 O.O.3d 401, 381 N.E.2d 184, syllabus, the Supreme Court held:

“Pursuant to Crim.R.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BridgemanOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re C.W.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. CombsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. Cline, 07ca02 (4-18-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. DulaneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. ShuckOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API