Legal Opinion

Kaufman v. De Cozen Motor Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 26, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bodine, J.

This action was upon a replevin bond. The plaintiff had judgment and the defendant appeals. In February of 1932, plaintiff purchased from the Keyport Auto Sales Company, Incorporated, a Chrysler sedan. A substantial down payment was made and a conditional sales contract was entered into for the balance of the purchase price. After plaintiff had paid in excess of a thousand dollars, he received notice on May 19th, 1932, that the DeCozen Motor Company claimed to be the owner of the car. It caused a writ of replevin to be issued executing the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wood Motor Car Co. v. Bankers Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
  2. General Motors Accept. Corp. v. LoweNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  3. Klivan v. MargolisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
  4. Klivan v. MargolisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API