Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1922No. Docket No. 107PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Sanilac; Beach (Watson), J. Petition by William Roberts against Oramel B. Fuller to set aside a sale of land delinquent for taxes. From a decree dismissing the petition, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The following description of land appeared on the tax roll of the city of Sandusky for the year 1917:

“Unplatted land in city of Sandusky, one acre of land in square form in N. W. corner of N. W. quarter of section 4, T. 11 N., R. 14 E., subject to all highways across same.”

There are streets on the north and west sides of this acre, one-half the width of each being taken therefrom. William Roberts, the plaintiff, had long owned this land and had paid the taxes on assessments substantially similar to that on the roll of 1917. On January 9, 1918, he made a written tender to the city treasurer of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Brooks v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McQuade v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API