Legal Opinion

State v. Jansen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 2005No. D9901083M; A124306PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

In this special statutory proceeding, the state appeals an order granting defendant’s motion to set aside her convictions for forgery and theft. The state argues that the trial court erred in granting the motion because defendant had multiple convictions within the preceding ten years. We agree and reverse.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Defendant pleaded guilty and was convicted of second-degree forgery and third-degree theft in October 2000. Both charges arose out of the same criminal episode. Three years later, defendant moved for an order setting aside the convictions. At the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. State v. SpivakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HartfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API