Legal Opinion

United Credit Plan of New Orleans, Inc. v. Franklin

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1969No. 3317PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YARRUT, Judge.

Plaintiff sued Mr. and Mrs. Maude Franklin for the balance due on a promissory note. The note was made payable to Scott Fence and Insulation Co., Inc. and had been purchased by Plaintiff. Mr. and Mrs. Franklin filed a third-party demand against Scott Fence and Insulation Co., Inc., alleging that their signatures on the note in the amount of $622.80 had been fraudulently obtained as they were told that the insulation work for which the note was given would cost no more than $445.00. Mr. and Mrs. Franklin paid $445.00 but refused to make any further payments on the note.

The Trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hale v. ForneaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Armstrong v. CopelandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Fadaol v. RideauLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Williams v. MorganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Schwartz Bros. v. ShaheenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colonial Bank v. Marina Seafood Market, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. Braddock v. GlosupLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Moore v. MooreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API