Mavity v. Wehner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal- to either party. Memorandum: In affirming the denial .of a motion to suppress a statement obtained by a private person in.violation of section 270-to of the Penal Law we also desire to point out that there is no statutory-provision for this motion. As to the admissibility of the' statement in question (see Sackler v. Sackler, 15 N Y 2d 40; Neff v. Franklinville Roofing Co., 308 N. Y. 946; Bloodgood v. Lynch, 293 N. Y. 308; Matter of Thanhauser v. Milprint, Inc., 9 A D 2d 833). (Appeal from *1009order of Monroe Special Term denying…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bloodgood v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Claim of Neff v. Franklinville Roofing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
3Cited by1 opinion
- Iannielli v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980