Tollett v. Titsworth
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George K. Cracraft, Judge.
The sole issue on this appeal from a declaratory judgment is what the rights are of the junior liénholder who has not been made a party to an action foreclosing a first mortgage lien after the sale. The trial court declared that none of the rights of the junior lienholder were affected by the foreclosure to which he was not a party and after the sale became prior and paramount to those of the purchaser. While we agree that a junior lienholder was a necessary party to that action and his rights were not immediately affected by the decree, we do not agree that his lien…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Skelly Oil Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Livingston v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Dickinson v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Harrison v. Bank of FordyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. Chickasaw Properties, LLC (In re Burrow)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013
- In re RussellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1989