Legal Opinion

Tollett v. Titsworth

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 13, 1984No. CA 83-463PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George K. Cracraft, Judge.

The sole issue on this appeal from a declaratory judgment is what the rights are of the junior liénholder who has not been made a party to an action foreclosing a first mortgage lien after the sale. The trial court declared that none of the rights of the junior lienholder were affected by the foreclosure to which he was not a party and after the sale became prior and paramount to those of the purchaser. While we agree that a junior lienholder was a necessary party to that action and his rights were not immediately affected by the decree, we do not agree that his lien…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Skelly Oil Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  2. Livingston v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Dickinson v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Harrison v. Bank of FordyceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Smith v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. Chickasaw Properties, LLC (In re Burrow)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2013
  2. In re RussellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API